About your Search

20121201
20121231
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)
. >> we can hear from the permit-holder now. >> good evening madame chair lady and good evening members of the board. my name is gus and even as you look at, this we have a lot of contradictions that are occur. now we only came across these citations this evening, at least i did and we had basically no time to respond to them. to make matters worse, you have a citation dated on the 3rd of december. you have another here dated the 4th of december. they are diametrically different. this one is talking about the violation. and this one is talking about a correction notice. and there is much difference between them. and the violation or the citation that mr. duffy is aware of is the one that is asking for correction. this is the one that we got from here. we just got this a few minutes ago. while mr. boskvich was talking. the issue is whether or not an installation or addition of a hood requires this notification. yes, the zoning administrator and mind you the zoning administrator has authority to make interpretations on the zoning code, as far back as 1996 has interpreted level 3 notific
of november 7, 2012. >> madam director on item ten, could the vote be changed to show it is 301? >> thank you, for that correction. >> if there is any public comment? >> if you could could please call the roll? >> we have a motion to adopt the november 7, 2012 minutes as amended. on that, commission hwang? >> aye. >> we will move to 4 a, i understand that the attorney and we could move forward it >> okay, this is 4 a and two rehearing requests, at 2750 larkin street and the board received a letter from ellman and huangfu requesting rehearing of appeals 12-090 and 091 decided on october 17th, at that time the board voted 4-1 with one vacancy to up hold the subject permit on the basis that it is code compliant. permit holder is peter fento, and the project to demolish the rear wall building new ad dish to the rear while conforming to the residential design guidelines by stepping back in the two directions. >> good evening, commissioners, and the attorney on behalf of the appellants, seligmam and i am here here today to ask for a rehearing and that the subject permit be set aside until all of th
-3 months. >> madame director, when would you like to move it to? >> march 6th would be 3 months and march 20th is another option. >> okay. march 6th,perhaps. >> march 6th. >> the date works. we object just for the record that this board is going to act for the fire department. i think what you are doing is inappropriate and we object to it. >> rc
Search Results 0 to 5 of about 6 (some duplicates have been removed)